{"id":"W3143829480","doi":"10.51270/44.2.155","title":"Archaeological Evidence in the Tsilhqot’in Decision","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Archaeology","topic":"Archaeological Research and Protection","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Archaeological evidence; Law; Context (archaeology); History; Archaeology; Plaintiff; Documentary evidence; Sovereignty; Empirical evidence; Political science; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01297033,0.0002244343,0.0006180197,0.002798448,0.02178779,0.01163363,0.002127057,0.005617463,0.006568704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04994074,0.0007382875,0.0003670225,0.004611537,0.01349718,0.00299201,0.003855875,0.006958897,0.0005485778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03170312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05227102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7923268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9167046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9847689,0.00230389,0.001042744,0.001459119,0.006912748,0.003512694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541255,0.02580259,0.0018148,0.002576722,0.01352863,0.002151762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002005778,0.00008223236,0.03224334,0.0003093904,0.00006179546,0.006161199,0.1115203,0.0005175536,0.002361004,0.678138,0.1328331,0.03557149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006899853,0.0000807519,0.08201546,0.001691904,0.000197773,0.001213433,0.104108,0.001129671,0.004898532,0.05468495,0.7495874,0.0003232589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4817689,0.004281962,0.003683342,0.06949601,0.001480019,0.0002226198,0.001787966,0.00005071449,0.4372285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9414333,0.001120385,0.001737141,0.01565673,0.0002313273,0.00006008978,0.0004494029,0.00003451153,0.03927714],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2076732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4177924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1040588522795401,"score_gpt":0.2812032446226224,"score_spread":0.1771443923430824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}