{"id":"W3144639995","doi":"","title":"Optimal quality choice under uncertainty on market development","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Capital Investment and Risk Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency","keywords":"Ambiguity aversion; Risk aversion (psychology); Microeconomics; Duopoly; Economics; Quality (philosophy); Profit (economics); Stackelberg competition; Ambiguity; Monopoly; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer science; Financial economics; Cournot competition","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009354613,0.000313707,0.0006383694,0.0004106216,0.0004801183,0.0000241694,0.0007072848,0.0001394894,0.002620429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001080024,0.0003800657,0.0004421496,0.0002949516,0.0004093376,0.0003151451,0.0004047223,0.000375973,0.0003775085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000364279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007823799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003833414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001361061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979943,0.0001447073,0.0005259955,0.0005337812,0.0001896358,0.0006115758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981549,0.0003106677,0.0004718236,0.0006570671,0.00005992917,0.0003456387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001670037,0.003962751,0.2230788,0.0003829672,0.003097444,0.00003945578,0.06480108,0.003862016,0.0003098106,0.6730941,0.01989161,0.005809941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002408537,0.0002378047,0.5923848,0.0001254467,0.0001065302,0.000007015226,0.01367374,0.008872856,0.00007918545,0.00413909,0.376707,0.001257998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9052504,0.002480538,0.0005638905,0.0006175284,0.000173299,0.0002362834,0.0003637067,0.00006084879,0.09025355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708875,0.001306752,0.007218872,0.0003024462,0.00008706292,0.00000117301,0.0001707429,0.00003257791,0.01999291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.668955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04935739739670619,"score_gpt":0.2334621416649369,"score_spread":0.1841047442682307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}