{"id":"W3146383562","doi":"10.1109/mper.2002.4312292","title":"On Walrasian Equilibrium for Pool-Based Electricity Markets","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Power Engineering Review","topic":"Electric Power System Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Hydro-Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Commodity; Economics; Convergence (economics); Electricity; Electricity market; Market power; Market clearing; Duality (order theory); Mathematical economics; Competition (biology); Microeconomics; Clearing; Mathematical optimization; Balance (ability); Competitive equilibrium; Mathematics; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001533432,0.0009453669,0.001426031,0.0007333995,0.001046402,0.002853693,0.001654951,0.001823196,0.00788385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003796825,0.0004946662,0.001366845,0.001169719,0.002674129,0.004411707,0.002136278,0.001947918,0.001419112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001852843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001632041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002958076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002182655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993492,0.0002880147,0.00001965895,0.00008474234,0.0001552046,0.0001031213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993286,0.0003513352,0.00008516886,0.00007378592,0.0001097686,0.00005144799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001396956,0.00001591603,0.00004286113,0.00002895666,0.00001060999,0.00004585235,0.00005432052,0.08207902,0.0002333717,0.9138698,0.001040164,0.002565108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002036078,0.00001914381,0.00004026617,0.00001807377,0.000007512155,0.00002600317,0.00001862925,0.2748269,0.00008527447,0.7214803,0.003443393,0.00001421066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0227943,0.002198121,0.9045178,0.001509044,0.0002076845,0.00007456754,0.0001449603,0.0001277605,0.06842579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8561102,0.004581865,0.1086033,0.0005907243,0.0006013198,0.0003609073,0.0001812464,0.0001829043,0.02878764],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00788385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0263741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009619603807664,"score_gpt":0.2068831853831332,"score_spread":0.1972635815754692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}