{"id":"W3146383562","doi":"10.1109/mper.2002.4312292","title":"On Walrasian Equilibrium for Pool-Based Electricity Markets","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Power Engineering Review","topic":"Electric Power System Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Hydro-Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Commodity; Economics; Convergence (economics); Electricity; Electricity market; Market power; Market clearing; Duality (order theory); Mathematical economics; Competition (biology); Microeconomics; Clearing; Mathematical optimization; Balance (ability); Competitive equilibrium; Mathematics; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003282225,0.0003761679,0.0005008598,0.0002087238,0.00002928908,0.0000370024,0.000267311,0.0001204443,0.0002070502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002415174,0.0003904903,0.0002064687,0.0006846146,0.000006285431,0.0001239178,0.000006048373,0.0002246503,0.0001483056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002266382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001158492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":6.611028e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.926388e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983355,0.00002818465,0.0004825182,0.0003105313,0.0002527017,0.0005905069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998996,0.0002444566,0.00005892296,0.0004851855,0.00006669208,0.0001487913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001930967,0.0001530293,0.00001220236,0.01536972,0.000223167,0.00002435677,0.00004286292,0.6613839,0.005369316,0.0004374974,0.3046314,0.01233324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000501916,0.0001357618,0.00003365768,0.002793262,0.000072107,0.00001684968,1.751413e-7,0.9241818,0.004963717,0.00000755776,0.06668131,0.000611865],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002559626,0.1487958,0.8307081,0.0006833526,0.003336789,0.003206628,0.00004108372,0.003030619,0.007637924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900823,0.004817483,0.003254239,0.0006216183,0.0001466349,0.0004639745,0.00002265023,0.0002573045,0.0003337512],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9875227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009619603807664,"score_gpt":0.2068831853831332,"score_spread":0.1972635815754692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}