{"id":"W3147609845","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11611","title":"A Jackknife empirical likelihood approach for<i>K</i>‐sample Tests","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Advanced Statistical Methods and Models","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; National Security Agency","keywords":"Jackknife resampling; Categorical variable; Empirical likelihood; Mathematics; Statistics; Independence (probability theory); Econometrics; Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Resampling; Correlation; Chi-square test; Parametric statistics; Confidence interval","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005187307,0.0001715265,0.0004627219,0.0001097836,0.0001599711,0.00007067079,0.0001842969,0.00009744684,0.0001492781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01456644,0.0001600224,0.0001081455,0.0001736166,0.000106871,0.000079085,0.00001479274,0.0002979873,0.000002194709],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001423611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002328558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001123573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002826987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983234,0.0001107121,0.0006398193,0.0001905199,0.0002306377,0.0005048793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940413,0.003394479,0.0002677936,0.000216261,0.001037877,0.001042338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004691621,0.0001896325,0.001142681,0.0004144538,0.0001885881,0.0009174229,0.001048066,0.0001962411,0.0001378887,0.7926111,0.1437651,0.05934193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006466369,0.0001828467,0.0001989805,0.00004305139,0.0001339245,0.0002887511,0.0002637596,0.003294444,0.0001273498,0.9731099,0.02149469,0.000215668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004769183,0.0002275867,0.9950953,0.0002501645,0.000260883,0.0001319984,0.002812144,0.000006590129,0.0007383851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01212037,0.00001658951,0.9869164,0.0004242829,0.0002392578,0.000006614833,0.00004248266,0.0000428735,0.000191087],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1804988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1713826120397324,"score_gpt":0.4079201915110203,"score_spread":0.2365375794712878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}