{"id":"W3148929026","doi":"10.5430/elr.v10n1p10","title":"Is Peer Feedback Helpful When Learning Literature Review Writing? A Study of Feedback Features and Quantity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"English Linguistics Research","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Peer feedback; Constructive; Reading (process); Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Writing process; Peer review; Mathematics education; Peer assessment; Computer science; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17445,0.0004570971,0.00194169,0.006119175,0.0009821679,0.00473629,0.001304022,0.001175712,0.00093274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.51028,0.0006285851,0.001175757,0.005629937,0.001813833,0.005742245,0.002391022,0.001116601,0.0003099275],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001734353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004627434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006329347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002325868,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7073143,0.221388,0.02178596,0.003995109,0.04423363,0.00128303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2878783,0.6171294,0.04236055,0.006797148,0.04278603,0.003048577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001374602,0.0003017468,0.0513461,0.02226315,0.001156851,0.0003526251,0.02338437,0.0002166772,0.00312358,0.0008175737,0.001330179,0.8943326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001544801,0.01843076,0.67442,0.08720463,0.008639665,0.01019995,0.08631542,0.005274177,0.01313704,0.01135304,0.08284207,0.0006384143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.6709912,0.2725479,0.0243834,0.01033825,0.0009939059,0.00214798,0.0002610127,0.0002476813,0.0180886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93242,0.04272193,0.02157578,0.0007709348,0.000456533,0.001000071,0.00008449683,0.00005940085,0.0009108121],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8255501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9225906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1447313827313703,"score_gpt":0.4989814303663223,"score_spread":0.354250047634952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}