{"id":"W3149448687","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13336","title":"A retrospective audit of cumulative ionising radiation levels in hospitalised pregnant patients","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","topic":"Radiation Dose and Imaging","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"NOSM University; McMaster University","funders":"Caring for our Country","keywords":"Medicine; Ionizing radiation; Cumulative dose; Radiological weapon; Retrospective cohort study; Fetus; Effective dose (radiation); Radiation exposure; Pregnancy; Radiation dose; Fluoroscopy; Audit; Pediatrics; Nuclear medicine; Obstetrics; Radiology; Internal medicine; Irradiation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000135259,0.0000838015,0.0003500158,0.0002686399,0.0000286528,0.00001918198,0.00002587474,0.00008295752,0.00009007729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001178971,0.00007045659,0.00004619426,0.0003224542,0.00004028513,0.0001567783,0.00001433341,0.0001777259,3.24028e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001103098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001908343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001641079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002663547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991307,0.00004695282,0.0004221435,0.0001175632,0.0001452964,0.0001372995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990377,0.0002141489,0.0003495881,0.00005607932,0.0002060015,0.0001364602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000165766,0.000131637,0.9120812,0.00001831273,0.00006287445,0.0001404872,0.001100041,0.0000104632,0.0001340438,0.00006537197,0.0004292832,0.08580973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005599781,0.0007834106,0.9907252,0.00005508011,0.0000618013,0.00004128034,0.000196704,0.00004807963,0.001084593,0.0004645556,0.0008748445,0.00006473273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970751,0.001107307,0.0000135383,0.000954825,0.0005649196,0.00009433683,0.000007271681,0.000001539691,0.0001811971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980335,0.0007411002,0.0002182868,0.00007704165,0.00003443858,3.222235e-7,0.000005944464,0.000005871127,0.0008835151],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.085745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2873136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02661155214341364,"score_gpt":0.2844156447196216,"score_spread":0.257804092576208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}