{"id":"W3149448687","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13336","title":"A retrospective audit of cumulative ionising radiation levels in hospitalised pregnant patients","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","topic":"Radiation Dose and Imaging","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"NOSM University; McMaster University","funders":"Caring for our Country","keywords":"Medicine; Ionizing radiation; Cumulative dose; Radiological weapon; Retrospective cohort study; Fetus; Effective dose (radiation); Radiation exposure; Pregnancy; Radiation dose; Fluoroscopy; Audit; Pediatrics; Nuclear medicine; Obstetrics; Radiology; Internal medicine; Irradiation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001202395,0.0002002831,0.0005535434,0.001546832,0.0004320559,0.0007031005,0.000432329,0.0004072379,0.001196493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006810066,0.0005094636,0.0003507887,0.002144617,0.0005950437,0.0003938137,0.0007685295,0.0005330874,0.000219201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009732429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000966582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004367577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003714987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975464,0.0006054795,0.0007199566,0.0004394386,0.0004973405,0.0001914776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906342,0.002463062,0.004909462,0.0005701075,0.0008941554,0.0005290084],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001473261,0.00002035703,0.9912775,0.0001644459,0.00003192169,0.00143406,0.0009069653,0.00006433193,0.0006326854,0.00003423539,0.0001931705,0.005093013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008255138,0.0004446638,0.9901055,0.0001571385,0.00006095344,0.005751113,0.00157691,0.0001222082,0.0006954276,0.00002803624,0.001034514,0.00001540484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972219,0.00108206,0.000223872,0.00006970247,0.000007648301,0.0000668066,0.0005536246,0.00001643296,0.0007579348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982109,0.000853156,0.0003380867,0.00008040838,0.000008271366,0.00003799839,0.0003612411,0.000007913907,0.0001019976],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004367577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008684337,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02661155214341364,"score_gpt":0.2844156447196216,"score_spread":0.257804092576208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}