{"id":"W3151782473","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1602","title":"Understanding the effects of counterfeit quality on consumer attitudes toward genuine brands: An associative judgment model","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Counterfeit; Quality (philosophy); Associative property; Psychology; Advertising; Brand names; Marketing; Cognition; Business; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004430586,0.0004708839,0.0003750846,0.0009427426,0.0004882861,0.002470414,0.0006596986,0.001468056,0.006131652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02161125,0.0003872695,0.0007649313,0.000565075,0.002362344,0.002716579,0.001512564,0.001351589,0.0003500998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009348374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005067927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004153892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002531433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987729,0.0006638075,0.0000416121,0.0001767485,0.0002272033,0.0001177389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967898,0.02406237,0.003045042,0.00219535,0.001816979,0.0009822964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003191465,0.004566316,0.5580488,0.000576581,0.0007268002,0.001453013,0.01315326,0.0515389,0.02877086,0.214914,0.001214543,0.1218456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002180718,0.002010408,0.4409962,0.0001343286,0.0006390358,0.0005235188,0.003726169,0.3046596,0.005000525,0.2402594,0.001630979,0.00020182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676151,0.00008851948,0.01375148,0.0005007085,0.00001455419,0.00004690951,0.00003900185,0.00002188327,0.01792179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984049,0.00003888417,0.00112981,0.0000411723,0.000007783711,0.00001270451,0.00001279691,0.000002625601,0.0003493966],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006131652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02343148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.316646799624398,"score_gpt":0.3715834746983403,"score_spread":0.05493667507394229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}