{"id":"W3152036265","doi":"10.1109/iros.2011.6048567","title":"A walking stability controller with disturbance rejection based on CMP criterion and Ground Reaction Force feedback","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems","topic":"Muscle activation and electromyography studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Control theory (sociology); Stability (learning theory); Controller (irrigation); Computer science; Feedback controller; Ground reaction force; Control engineering; Engineering; Control (management); Physics; Artificial intelligence; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003101764,0.0008300067,0.0007137565,0.0004182302,0.0004105436,0.0006997155,0.001128798,0.0006612596,0.001226656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005677455,0.0002111052,0.0002840937,0.0002547792,0.0003169952,0.0004157636,0.0005002657,0.000610441,0.0005163825],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003559713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005599331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002559962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002522399,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996313,0.00002630992,0.00002595952,0.00009913044,0.0001763805,0.00004086499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996517,0.00005552608,0.00006705149,0.00002648805,0.0001692998,0.00002985992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007743614,0.0004483463,0.001120151,0.0008277229,0.0001939677,0.001046896,0.0003690181,0.1789407,0.2475819,0.009409576,0.0069474,0.55234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002780436,0.0008231939,0.001648322,0.00003782512,0.00006172924,0.000519066,0.00002533411,0.9529954,0.03507963,0.001247972,0.007236929,0.0000465874],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01473892,0.0003084479,0.9803124,0.00006500525,0.000142646,0.00007597158,0.00003145463,0.001782561,0.002542616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8548069,0.0002267207,0.1395149,0.0001337958,0.0001065565,0.0002919491,0.0001301832,0.00008934238,0.00469959],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002559962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005090117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05742005047657768,"score_gpt":0.2413197420053607,"score_spread":0.183899691528783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}