{"id":"W3152234664","doi":"10.1002/ece3.7378","title":"Population abundance in arctic grayling using genetics and close‐kin mark‐recapture","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Yukon Department of Environment; Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Grayling; Arctic; Abundance (ecology); Population; Abundance estimation; Ecology; Biology; Effective population size; Coregonus; Population size; Mark and recapture; Fishery; Geography; Genetic diversity; Demography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001554079,0.00006151808,0.0000927877,0.00002687313,0.0001914992,0.000006019457,0.00002261496,0.00009190119,0.0001146237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004792465,0.00006742137,0.000008399993,0.0000999839,0.0001083194,0.00009548633,0.0001269623,0.00008627217,0.000009074962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001212603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003421403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001551537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01877876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994363,0.00006842836,0.0001013785,0.0002083807,0.00003536445,0.0001502005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998521,0.00003443106,0.00003604444,0.00005536696,0.00000419455,0.00001781368],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007500721,0.00002100373,0.9977403,0.00001258388,0.000005929554,0.000008182938,0.00009980498,0.001053651,0.0002486058,0.0004044479,0.0001662018,0.0002318353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002022574,0.0000203962,0.9857872,0.000006834948,0.00001536732,0.00001417995,0.00009880335,0.004617061,0.000009043807,0.008983942,0.0001763012,0.0000685877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.99809,0.0003555091,0.0001825589,0.0005188617,0.0001689589,0.00007966059,5.984702e-7,0.000008503543,0.0005953127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980735,0.0002529388,0.001202951,0.0002736262,0.00001875347,0.000005421706,0.000004989821,0.000003050054,0.0001647767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01862361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008130352814648214,"score_gpt":0.2171451229647879,"score_spread":0.2090147701501397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}