{"id":"W3153975732","doi":"10.5539/jmr.v13n3p13","title":"On Notations for Conic Hulls and Related Considerations on Tangent Cones","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematics Research","topic":"Optimization and Variational Analysis","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Conic section; Tangent cone; Notation; Conic optimization; Cone (formal languages); Tangent; Dual cone and polar cone; Convex hull; Convex cone; Regular polygon; Constraint (computer-aided design); Set (abstract data type); Convex set; Combinatorics; Geometry; Convex optimization; Algorithm; Computer science; Arithmetic","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005003597,0.002158774,0.001044428,0.003273617,0.002215596,0.005339304,0.003109905,0.002255913,0.01094074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009122912,0.0006902148,0.001687062,0.005082523,0.00578228,0.009119926,0.003049545,0.007788135,0.00292469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001809294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001070047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002528368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002263658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971506,0.001009244,0.0002921495,0.0004631443,0.0008291701,0.0002557708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959365,0.001466021,0.000664241,0.0004126309,0.001120983,0.0003996154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009665186,0.00001144612,0.00004717792,0.00005819083,0.000002712881,0.00009682064,0.0002302082,0.0007956956,0.0006039869,0.9910885,0.00262136,0.004434195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001763529,0.0001106253,0.0003125126,0.0001675125,0.00001978595,0.0003024694,0.0003835421,0.01156848,0.001076283,0.9025218,0.08345809,0.00006140416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01022563,0.005591258,0.9215196,0.003822449,0.002932431,0.0001726479,0.000773664,0.0003076422,0.05465464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2766978,0.01469239,0.6439864,0.006849631,0.004695365,0.001269987,0.001833351,0.00144289,0.04853216],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01094074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03660041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1385244782720385,"score_gpt":0.4143906219020729,"score_spread":0.2758661436300345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}