{"id":"W3153975732","doi":"10.5539/jmr.v13n3p13","title":"On Notations for Conic Hulls and Related Considerations on Tangent Cones","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematics Research","topic":"Optimization and Variational Analysis","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Conic section; Tangent cone; Notation; Conic optimization; Cone (formal languages); Tangent; Dual cone and polar cone; Convex hull; Convex cone; Regular polygon; Constraint (computer-aided design); Set (abstract data type); Convex set; Combinatorics; Geometry; Convex optimization; Algorithm; Computer science; Arithmetic","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001204017,0.00005210231,0.0001494595,0.0002719111,0.0002384873,0.0002281867,0.0001270422,0.00003614815,0.0001574534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002392609,0.00004161396,0.00007073289,0.0003332336,0.00003573396,0.0001306529,0.00004168647,0.0001782484,0.00002037997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004256445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002828751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.944338e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003351146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987494,0.0001304604,0.0003680566,0.0001051901,0.0005327466,0.0001141759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948243,0.003172772,0.0001567073,0.0001647725,0.001599041,0.00008241167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003241051,0.0002469273,0.000004419157,0.00001884105,0.00008458743,0.00001672448,0.0008100324,0.004869584,0.0003849158,0.9899499,0.00343107,0.0001797777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091821,0.0003395589,0.0001633322,0.0001155302,0.00002899021,0.0001620345,0.0005412948,0.4004185,0.001962859,0.5947485,0.000511268,0.00008992694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03480471,0.00033768,0.8779691,0.08015261,0.0003418849,0.0004480363,0.00002317332,0.0000254789,0.005897334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7368903,0.0001927116,0.2605437,0.0004316086,0.00005219489,0.00001358537,0.000004569536,0.0000108995,0.001860439],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7020856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2864349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1385244782720385,"score_gpt":0.4143906219020729,"score_spread":0.2758661436300345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}