{"id":"W3154172125","doi":"","title":"'A Rhetoric of Its Own.' Review of the Rhetoric of Canadian Writing Edited by Conny Steenman-Marcusse","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Suspect; Rhetorical question; Criticism; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Literature; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics; Art; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00444638,0.001110836,0.0007709122,0.007402892,0.02497441,0.0151689,0.002321259,0.003090469,0.007179458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01335687,0.0004784664,0.0004643766,0.01071176,0.02672483,0.005299999,0.002165546,0.0050094,0.001572539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08034115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1044362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8856235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94425,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942781,0.001332054,0.0001024785,0.0003078918,0.003177106,0.0008022689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919629,0.002071644,0.0004232848,0.0002159922,0.004684106,0.0006420839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001965826,0.000005642583,0.0003003094,0.0004295091,0.00000908029,0.0001655091,0.03813284,0.00009460103,0.0001838566,0.2669354,0.6516342,0.04208951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002013369,0.00000282158,0.0005460426,0.0004002972,0.000006650931,0.00007142506,0.01093093,0.00003904614,0.00009193122,0.006596016,0.9812962,0.00001655552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00554257,0.3235125,0.002539963,0.3766646,0.02368303,0.00004717823,0.0004312217,0.000213512,0.2673655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4112646,0.2391958,0.006203883,0.05072531,0.01288572,0.0001150274,0.0004746859,0.0007601384,0.2783747],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1143765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5829186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009254304827124266,"score_gpt":0.2351070037955788,"score_spread":0.2258526989684545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}