{"id":"W3154787607","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0249707","title":"Family as a health promotion setting: A scoping review of conceptual models of the health-promoting family","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"School Health and Nursing Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Brock University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"PsycINFO; CINAHL; Grey literature; Health promotion; MEDLINE; Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Conceptual model; Conceptual framework; Promotion (chess); Psychology; Medicine; Public health; Computer science; Sociology; Nursing; Social psychology; Psychological intervention; Political science; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04292933,0.00196804,0.003877621,0.01974281,0.002512155,0.008662803,0.003981436,0.004527117,0.003833088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08218205,0.001415168,0.005135037,0.01921843,0.006179789,0.01282082,0.004407892,0.004600191,0.0004772107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01307736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02960634,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01876004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01968943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9805087,0.01211232,0.00313333,0.001268414,0.002456857,0.0005203673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8705189,0.1166719,0.005853917,0.001669244,0.004719708,0.0005663674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001920895,0.0001052946,0.003386052,0.4448153,0.001741388,0.0005778644,0.03249877,0.001442269,0.0001700732,0.07138741,0.01182793,0.4318555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002188002,0.00006660773,0.00251292,0.8891088,0.001936162,0.0006246694,0.01121477,0.0003866058,0.0001107577,0.01315967,0.08079964,0.00005743994],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009352688,0.9935328,0.001133869,0.002583106,0.0002235988,0.0001071496,0.00006895493,0.000007690744,0.001407466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01717036,0.9786993,0.002341471,0.0009426943,0.0001135759,0.0004868076,0.00009187349,0.000007179588,0.0001465994],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04292933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2270347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4386033654311421,"score_gpt":0.5143467446121115,"score_spread":0.0757433791809694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}