{"id":"W3155386419","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.04.003","title":"Effectiveness of Workplace Interventions to Reduce the Risk for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Diabetes","topic":"Workplace Health and Well-being","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact; Diabetes Canada; McMaster University","funders":"Diabetes Canada; Canadian Diabetes Association","keywords":"Medicine; Meta-analysis; Psychological intervention; Confidence interval; Randomized controlled trial; Type 2 diabetes; Relative risk; MEDLINE; Strictly standardized mean difference; Internal medicine; Diabetes mellitus; Weight loss; Systematic review; Physical therapy; Obesity; Endocrinology; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00711795,0.002544099,0.01858342,0.003710597,0.0006614797,0.002540849,0.00198044,0.002691831,0.003325388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01893315,0.001526315,0.02685614,0.00391261,0.0007858632,0.001602363,0.001597148,0.002802723,0.0002531771],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002665534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003484888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01195042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02603257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958885,0.001508975,0.001214954,0.0005492404,0.0006107427,0.0002276311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914659,0.006148084,0.001380587,0.0002552773,0.0005491241,0.000200961],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006150868,0.0001814004,0.002508086,0.4261856,0.5376422,0.0001097656,0.0001140035,0.0004360019,0.0003089023,0.0001033396,0.0005170067,0.0257428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002253985,0.0004827463,0.003968878,0.02571855,0.9659255,0.00006838366,0.00007055023,0.0001439801,0.0001223885,0.0001177815,0.001097905,0.00002939849],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.006859816,0.9919343,0.000333064,0.00009722392,0.0001597523,0.0002206715,0.0002129134,0.0000194636,0.0001627699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1432971,0.8528209,0.001874086,0.0006091188,0.0002043416,0.0005323919,0.0003698107,0.00001822717,0.0002740246],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01858342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03764379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1166838575706631,"score_gpt":0.4450641789752963,"score_spread":0.3283803214046332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}