{"id":"W3155784772","doi":"10.1007/s13194-021-00361-w","title":"Feyerabend, funding, and the freedom of science: the case of traditional Chinese medicine","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Argument (complex analysis); Academic freedom; Intellectual freedom; Government (linguistics); China; Science studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Censorship; Higher education; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01020292,0.0003483325,0.0007123981,0.001298879,0.01324944,0.008321352,0.001234479,0.00979725,0.009260901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009018413,0.000379294,0.0005914673,0.001685012,0.04721685,0.007618891,0.006967276,0.004840122,0.0003401019],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01282209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01609989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04516991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04184706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946797,0.002446875,0.0001864615,0.0004751229,0.0007025719,0.001509159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924655,0.005462507,0.0003355431,0.0006684122,0.0004683663,0.0005996409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002624353,0.00001113387,0.0003643924,0.00002191675,0.000005306277,0.0001632413,0.00425133,0.00009925222,0.00005889103,0.991305,0.001178492,0.002514878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001203338,0.00003903589,0.001772627,0.0001661469,0.00003503873,0.000261988,0.005733761,0.0004770043,0.0002650714,0.9193435,0.07174846,0.00003700799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1832511,0.01003251,0.005530175,0.1610851,0.0004039137,0.0001071529,0.00008426215,0.00002759614,0.6394782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836061,0.0009508384,0.000714583,0.003423524,0.0002111981,0.00004590431,0.000008475547,0.00001208324,0.01102722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9897971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09303123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09535885830801384,"score_gpt":0.2754639677677977,"score_spread":0.1801051094597839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}