{"id":"W3155784772","doi":"10.1007/s13194-021-00361-w","title":"Feyerabend, funding, and the freedom of science: the case of traditional Chinese medicine","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Argument (complex analysis); Academic freedom; Intellectual freedom; Government (linguistics); China; Science studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Censorship; Higher education; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007618822,0.0001224884,0.0002628431,0.0002803851,0.003493286,0.0001030659,0.001090022,0.000005900245,0.0001483898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009044146,0.00006034074,0.0001108828,0.0004882914,0.06657322,0.0006920088,0.0001294069,0.0001997035,9.602104e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002190111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002653485,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002462081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001638001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980476,0.0001537436,0.0005503122,0.0002531857,0.0007776568,0.0002175389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977357,0.0003846868,0.0005417024,0.000285422,0.0009183747,0.000134113],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006682432,0.0001130322,0.0000234428,0.00002709203,0.00001277322,0.00007527284,0.04438876,0.00002201855,0.004359091,0.950089,0.0002238477,0.0005988065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006460207,0.003395864,0.004069381,0.0004617993,0.0001801205,0.005211837,0.04021502,0.001136151,0.0008404278,0.9311218,0.006497957,0.0004093912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7943202,0.001156838,0.00005446578,0.01028659,0.002548179,0.00025252,0.00006547476,0.00000712708,0.1913086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984118,0.00002528115,0.000152028,0.0001457622,0.001100411,0.000001256084,3.609017e-7,0.000006417794,0.0001566329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2040916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09535885830801384,"score_gpt":0.2754639677677977,"score_spread":0.1801051094597839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}