{"id":"W3159250162","doi":"10.46578/humder.875260","title":"Comparison of the predictability of the ultimate axial strength of elliptical CFST columns using existing square and circular section-based code formulae","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harran Üniversitesi Mühendislik Dergisi","topic":"Structural Load-Bearing Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Structural engineering; Eurocode; Axial symmetry; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Christian ministry; Engineering; Ultimate tensile strength; Code (set theory); Materials science; Composite material; Computer science; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002110874,0.0007001184,0.000469746,0.002951085,0.0002056526,0.0006378687,0.0008282188,0.0004626798,0.0007321624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008888041,0.0002331425,0.0005869248,0.001491757,0.0004232006,0.0009496599,0.0005199537,0.0004644186,0.0004272034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005604954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008701825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01475755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0149924,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990619,0.0001413201,0.00007033253,0.0002701838,0.0003773121,0.00007890215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913045,0.004559756,0.001145632,0.0008249856,0.001999951,0.0001650765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000917487,0.0003338887,0.367714,0.000277141,0.0002181188,0.0003568188,0.0002112296,0.4437878,0.01105199,0.001418143,0.002648749,0.1710646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001754988,0.0001414955,0.08914646,0.00002376766,0.00003565407,0.00009653546,0.00005504565,0.9032426,0.006239462,0.0003334306,0.000624086,0.0000438107],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556003,0.0003678618,0.03994435,0.00004266846,0.00003054305,0.00005189778,0.001815317,0.000856674,0.001290307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880509,0.0001636441,0.008635966,0.00001074066,0.000009996037,0.00003592961,0.002710905,0.00006309007,0.0003187724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01475755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02934331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02582350471432313,"score_gpt":0.2561144799050815,"score_spread":0.2302909751907584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}