{"id":"W3160569813","doi":"10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100061","title":"Envisioning an international validation process for New Approach Methodologies in chemical hazard and risk assessment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Advances","topic":"Delphi Technique in Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université Laval; McGill University","funders":"Genome Prairie; McGill University; Génome Québec; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Saskatchewan; Government of Canada; Ministère de l'Économie, de la Science et de l'Innovation - Québec; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Genome Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Standardization; Process (computing); Delphi method; Knowledge management; Computer science; Government (linguistics); Harmonization; Data sharing; Hazard; Business; Process management; Data science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.668958,0.002136213,0.00137819,0.006820934,0.009604466,0.02349219,0.007403049,0.01186312,0.003311869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2912537,0.001686605,0.002989816,0.004709085,0.02302996,0.0287062,0.0261116,0.01938641,0.001470926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01681167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07747924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005289768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003261811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.570879,0.332394,0.02291536,0.01537376,0.04711568,0.01132217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4280151,0.2891842,0.03430891,0.05539748,0.1756476,0.01744665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004251953,0.001347938,0.01375816,0.002489085,0.0002660492,0.001927263,0.1317929,0.0112355,0.01533719,0.5361982,0.01329484,0.2719277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002735656,0.002685907,0.01373318,0.0121834,0.000249736,0.001403009,0.1008342,0.01812501,0.01577919,0.3711208,0.4629581,0.0006539607],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05727952,0.004000617,0.6965197,0.1443807,0.002052526,0.006314924,0.0001519236,0.0007152876,0.08858478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.320119,0.00206414,0.6504175,0.01394835,0.0004420738,0.004202463,0.0003654898,0.0004123895,0.008028684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.331042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4082338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1726043659957145,"score_gpt":0.5153536333914877,"score_spread":0.3427492673957732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}