{"id":"W3161045350","doi":"10.1063/5.0051346","title":"Comparison of different attenuation compensation methods in the estimation of the ultrasound backscatter coefficient","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIP conference proceedings","topic":"Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Attenuation; Backscatter (email); Attenuation coefficient; Imaging phantom; Correction for attenuation; Compensation (psychology); Optics; Acoustics; Materials science; Physics; Computer science; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004490343,0.0001144274,0.0002879867,0.00008421534,0.00005993044,0.00003483986,0.0001411885,0.00005265441,0.0000437466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004645735,0.00006778543,0.00009100373,0.0005197125,0.000168652,0.000074093,0.00002479223,0.0002175847,0.000001651625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002976795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006456026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000229496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006208948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988431,0.00007277439,0.0004138616,0.0001797691,0.0003549629,0.0001355343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987808,0.000304413,0.0002611473,0.0001636956,0.0004654553,0.00002447773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002000844,0.0002943307,0.6157864,0.0001291505,0.00001796944,4.732429e-8,0.009723997,0.00002618208,0.3704427,0.001049946,0.0001440062,0.002365195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005154093,0.0001140472,0.8645284,0.0003651009,0.0001277704,0.00002719085,0.007167924,0.01555695,0.1105483,0.0008099701,0.0001534237,0.0000855211],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9501808,0.00004919405,0.04596033,0.002361676,0.00008948854,0.0002872969,0.00000243687,0.00001111698,0.001057703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904369,0.000009113314,0.009224529,0.0002381049,0.00001628239,0.0000174222,0.00002217019,0.000006917665,0.00002853281],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2598944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.276421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03937400278921116,"score_gpt":0.3541458996908594,"score_spread":0.3147718969016483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}