{"id":"W3161311896","doi":"10.1145/1454497.1454485","title":"Dynamic analysis of Ada programs for comprehension and quality measurement","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM SIGAda Ada Letters","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Program comprehension; Schema (genetic algorithms); Software engineering; Software quality; Comprehension; Visualization; Programming language; Call graph; Software; Set (abstract data type); Software system; Data mining; Software development; Information retrieval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005836114,0.0001348548,0.0003099048,0.0002429897,0.0000901329,0.00003441059,0.0007498531,0.00003832802,0.000001685932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006184374,0.0001282063,0.0001266724,0.0008474325,0.0000909599,0.0001577117,0.0002831302,0.0001003382,9.118295e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009822075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000410243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002430296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006723891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981332,0.00006495492,0.0002875113,0.0003892523,0.0008272492,0.0002978655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980076,0.0007393275,0.00008585261,0.0008950378,0.0001778915,0.00009427462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001401429,0.0005127771,0.4417093,0.0007695268,0.00347858,0.00007824098,0.003405565,0.01277962,0.4552234,0.0005098568,0.003862553,0.0775304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001023855,0.000186539,0.9143648,0.00006871318,0.0001580016,0.000009260811,0.00003032131,0.07710755,0.005386888,0.00008103641,0.001108054,0.0004750334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6610312,0.0001446882,0.3373359,0.001103895,0.00006712381,0.0002248622,0.000002383951,0.00008885073,0.000001097612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9200322,0.000009644943,0.07964309,0.0002467278,0.000008104814,0.00003832681,0.000007873464,0.000009462097,0.000004554766],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4726554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08656111550795259,"score_gpt":0.3013409992798645,"score_spread":0.2147798837719119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}