{"id":"W3161458404","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2021.2.004","title":"An EOQ model with stepwise ordering cost and the finite planning horizon under carbon cap-and-trade regulations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Maritime Ports and Logistics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic order quantity; Order (exchange); Total cost; Constraint (computer-aided design); Minification; Time horizon; Realization (probability); Carbon fibers; Holding cost; Heuristic; Mathematical optimization; Relevant cost; Operations research; Computer science; Economics; Supply chain; Microeconomics; Business; Mathematics; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001960948,0.001797578,0.001758822,0.001187498,0.0008703106,0.00252586,0.002728933,0.002941239,0.007916293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003827144,0.001228891,0.001423451,0.001856406,0.001536751,0.003068714,0.001182074,0.002099563,0.0006336796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002922337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003095784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02252916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01031393,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998472,0.000435259,0.00007361441,0.0003596623,0.0003086152,0.0003508131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979137,0.001101934,0.0003944786,0.00009784002,0.0003200271,0.0001720852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004147523,0.00003063317,0.0002206519,0.0000641653,0.00001530159,0.0001825958,0.00002540994,0.9687786,0.0004286053,0.02758313,0.0003548043,0.002274653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002467908,0.00002590512,0.0001459034,0.00000843799,0.00001184341,0.00002778238,0.000017946,0.9893866,0.0001206518,0.009699835,0.0005181523,0.0000122843],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.085005,0.001103063,0.881788,0.001412983,0.0001796856,0.0003078746,0.001631739,0.0004291974,0.02814252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8835914,0.00132454,0.08947424,0.0002199098,0.00007115513,0.0006714437,0.000859723,0.0001314459,0.02365611],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02252916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04479605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02309853307005989,"score_gpt":0.2571056138699491,"score_spread":0.2340070807998892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}