{"id":"W3161608133","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v16i1.6141","title":"Canadian Librarians as Research Ethics Board Members: An Exploratory Case Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Alberta; Australian Government","keywords":"Exploratory research; Research ethics; Perspective (graphical); Institutional review board; Order (exchange); Public relations; Ethical issues; Library science; Political science; Medical education; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Business; Computer science; Social science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0195238,0.0007495479,0.001022604,0.004774516,0.05151146,0.009336015,0.004062375,0.006141176,0.00479811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03776326,0.0009784255,0.0005996439,0.00997115,0.01209562,0.003894173,0.008337394,0.004411062,0.0007476036],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0791975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09747279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.693527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.856445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9620926,0.02281673,0.000987424,0.00157128,0.006126295,0.006405658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658409,0.01633097,0.002863448,0.0008262345,0.005877258,0.00826123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008318953,0.0003987254,0.01119747,0.0003971812,0.00001577809,0.02021476,0.9236018,0.0001806625,0.0003997811,0.01246358,0.0110508,0.01999624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000145641,0.00006867036,0.003304816,0.0004216471,0.00001696279,0.002846913,0.9349651,0.0002080777,0.0002017349,0.0007241112,0.05718441,0.00004298712],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9015906,0.005274272,0.003398716,0.02771718,0.0003341395,0.001790329,0.0002328671,0.00005922644,0.05960267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641834,0.004836866,0.005468344,0.006992048,0.0000971712,0.0007648988,0.0001048125,0.00005057413,0.01750181],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6165558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6190422253389766,"score_gpt":0.5849945273099497,"score_spread":0.03404769802902685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}