{"id":"W3161837187","doi":"10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.066","title":"Why extinction estimates from extant phylogenies are so often zero","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Biology","topic":"Evolution and Paleontology Studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Oregon","keywords":"Extinction (optical mineralogy); Extant taxon; Biology; Phylogenetic tree; Macroevolution; Diversification (marketing strategy); Evolutionary biology; Zero (linguistics); Estimator; Phylogenetics; Statistics; Paleontology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006767357,0.0001341561,0.0002363865,0.00003851186,0.0002458033,0.00002194356,0.0001041448,0.00009620882,0.002211063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001451345,0.0001060615,0.00006647986,0.0001059049,0.0002638671,0.00005112704,0.0000214609,0.0001321759,0.000328474],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003270673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003217287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004177048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0219999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990604,0.0001258251,0.0001802313,0.0003228085,0.00005533637,0.0002554299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993966,0.0002429631,0.0000852075,0.0001452213,0.0000684956,0.00006151961],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001546049,0.00001910669,0.9590525,0.000007370236,0.00004124422,0.000006952197,0.00009004174,0.00002223263,0.0001983563,0.00005616884,0.008261495,0.03222905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000165813,0.00003604838,0.7644217,0.00001292051,0.00002444992,0.000009193499,0.0001507885,0.0004610112,0.0001502347,0.004331798,0.2301127,0.0001233127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7802325,0.2016208,0.003162377,0.003632708,0.006895206,0.0001310401,0.0006935527,0.0001665904,0.003465207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950781,0.002141526,0.0005260835,0.001102063,0.0002708305,0.000003007973,0.0008235021,0.000002273092,0.00005263338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2218512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04166878888398757,"score_gpt":0.273681618581097,"score_spread":0.2320128296971094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}