{"id":"W3162154867","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court in a Pluralistic World: Four Readings of a Reference","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Narrative; Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Notice; Sociology; Legal realism; Legal research; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005832732,0.0008281363,0.0007410009,0.002861877,0.03343063,0.02579432,0.003364884,0.008657673,0.002145731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01070134,0.00048942,0.0004985679,0.004945029,0.07749498,0.01016895,0.007444274,0.009964698,0.0001970148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08036469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03616997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5694635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5598887,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864049,0.007400308,0.0002731291,0.001117582,0.003158606,0.001645583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946663,0.002762158,0.0003362533,0.0003321732,0.001293439,0.0006096341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007022565,0.000006496026,0.0001954701,0.00001684025,0.000002723413,0.0002180479,0.1296261,0.0001135701,0.00008429889,0.8655127,0.002257627,0.001959208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001951454,0.00003999563,0.001710872,0.0005396754,0.00002385116,0.0002197049,0.2931617,0.001156875,0.0003643719,0.4500305,0.2526313,0.0001016181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.181012,0.01510617,0.01374885,0.11322,0.0008097119,0.0001018491,0.0001507386,0.0001011917,0.6757495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811436,0.001154576,0.001248561,0.002558011,0.0001215495,0.000037479,0.0000300356,0.00003961947,0.01366659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5694635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8661441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05260114905747203,"score_gpt":0.3123857230601679,"score_spread":0.2597845740026959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}