{"id":"W3162321264","doi":"10.1145/1082983.1082959","title":"A COTS architectural component specification stencil for selection and reasoning","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes","topic":"Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Component (thermodynamics); Reuse; Computer science; Stencil; Component-based software engineering; Selection (genetic algorithm); Reusability; Time to market; Software; Software engineering; Reliability engineering; Embedded system; Distributed computing; Programming language; Software development; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007342162,0.002517281,0.001749879,0.005079507,0.002042498,0.008068183,0.003058644,0.003245388,0.02543816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01281846,0.002383139,0.00433222,0.003022405,0.001388652,0.004086676,0.003579639,0.003808402,0.01338205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002393871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006138659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008915748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01253206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953507,0.00112812,0.001162904,0.0004873538,0.001619284,0.00025162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938113,0.002679709,0.000460105,0.001414115,0.001434165,0.0002005827],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003566291,0.0002387544,0.002154121,0.002126221,0.0002104891,0.003382518,0.002727648,0.03159428,0.02916833,0.4208256,0.1219331,0.3852823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001938603,0.00009404658,0.0005079109,0.0009465278,0.00009245909,0.001336499,0.0004355726,0.1393709,0.02479935,0.0838142,0.7481828,0.0002258124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006186083,0.0001176596,0.97081,0.0003004288,0.0001035677,0.0004219876,0.00154158,0.02238112,0.003705079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009466726,0.0003876009,0.9713672,0.0004363386,0.00005391895,0.0007218088,0.00544897,0.004077774,0.008039618],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02543816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0850991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03449034973849217,"score_gpt":0.2696294193737587,"score_spread":0.2351390696352665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}