{"id":"W3163252776","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01244.x","title":"The Price Effects of Event‐Risk Protection: The Results from a Natural Experiment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Credit Risk and Financial Regulations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Issuer; Comparability; Bond; Event study; Event (particle physics); Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Natural experiment; Bond valuation; Econometrics; Financial economics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01474276,0.0006824034,0.00116136,0.0004134895,0.0009088845,0.002295088,0.001658337,0.002861557,0.01548053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07226381,0.0004471679,0.0009238339,0.0003805767,0.002812303,0.003281086,0.001460774,0.003895574,0.001642335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007672883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009684607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006777388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005058328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912748,0.005059933,0.0006386094,0.0010947,0.00156523,0.0003667057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8393536,0.128873,0.0143502,0.01288506,0.00264468,0.001893495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.176974,0.2510176,0.05706758,0.004428286,0.002040303,0.00216405,0.007898324,0.02101952,0.1135321,0.1827497,0.02163873,0.1594699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05746865,0.208613,0.1533046,0.0004306546,0.002266418,0.00165705,0.002726337,0.07907332,0.05907604,0.3796011,0.05505704,0.0007258403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9590908,0.0002278658,0.01293676,0.002148231,0.0005086189,0.002497032,0.0008764612,0.0001271672,0.02158703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719089,0.0002360778,0.01338318,0.002102756,0.0002881877,0.004263703,0.0004309002,0.00006331102,0.007323096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01548053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07796812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08069201403991479,"score_gpt":0.3007496494646755,"score_spread":0.2200576354247607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}