{"id":"W3163252776","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01244.x","title":"The Price Effects of Event‐Risk Protection: The Results from a Natural Experiment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Credit Risk and Financial Regulations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Issuer; Comparability; Bond; Event study; Event (particle physics); Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Natural experiment; Bond valuation; Econometrics; Financial economics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007182308,0.0001077307,0.0003526005,0.00005408693,0.0003727974,0.00002758571,0.0002433495,0.0000443359,0.000005530891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002268936,0.00005802261,0.0002413428,0.0002061683,0.0001791196,0.0001360799,0.00008150876,0.0003226476,0.00001055546],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000868009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002650334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003914184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005574428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986554,0.00005418336,0.0009086713,0.000131268,0.00009596657,0.0001545123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977844,0.0006197438,0.001204968,0.0001961572,0.000156891,0.00003778456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0116626,0.004075416,0.2627985,0.0002125203,0.01130936,0.0002024577,0.2315187,0.0004849466,0.0007417111,0.2201381,0.1551867,0.101669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001215923,0.0006554393,0.7794962,0.00006450591,0.00005313303,0.000009103117,0.001143835,0.000146042,0.001324817,0.02251193,0.1932244,0.0001547146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.933006,0.05777967,0.001258782,0.003082962,0.002681274,0.0003144716,0.00003593902,0.000007514779,0.001833392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968312,0.002078471,0.0002702083,0.00002325148,0.0005117019,0.00001421434,2.859352e-7,0.000006710943,0.0002640048],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5166977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2867294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08069201403991479,"score_gpt":0.3007496494646755,"score_spread":0.2200576354247607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}