{"id":"W3163484650","doi":"","title":"Do Juries Understand the Criminal Standard of Proof of Beyond Reasonable Doubt?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland)","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Jury; Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); High Court; Reasonable doubt; Law; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Jury trial; Phrase; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001158633,0.0002412126,0.000741175,0.0002244144,0.0006661867,0.00002515097,0.001015799,0.0002690358,0.001506175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002025461,0.0002460413,0.0003458141,0.0006776234,0.00236175,0.000198679,0.0003842879,0.0002325529,0.00005150671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001047261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000903137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007180601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01077728,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972931,0.0004150508,0.0003348376,0.0004767544,0.001084606,0.0003956167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965618,0.0004081322,0.0008290412,0.0006465412,0.001397855,0.0001566392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004821455,0.0006203371,0.1047146,0.0009725711,0.0009706179,0.0002042838,0.8451328,0.0004444857,0.0004705616,0.02401252,0.001779187,0.01585663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001979736,0.0001387206,0.003313714,0.0003668445,0.000405866,0.000005136842,0.9595368,0.00002078005,0.0007535885,0.01557949,0.0175664,0.0003329123],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687942,0.0003911893,0.004108333,0.001638966,0.00008051446,0.0003226064,0.001433206,0.00004321955,0.02318776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904502,0.0002277039,0.001741756,0.00001194998,0.00002902169,3.789708e-8,0.00001477996,0.00001808394,0.00750649],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1144041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02540723977455832,"score_gpt":0.2452614307588536,"score_spread":0.2198541909842953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}