{"id":"W3163484650","doi":"","title":"Do Juries Understand the Criminal Standard of Proof of Beyond Reasonable Doubt?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland)","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Jury; Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); High Court; Reasonable doubt; Law; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Jury trial; Phrase; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03206062,0.0003833875,0.001041024,0.002617041,0.005997714,0.01304606,0.002496163,0.01838809,0.01047738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1874492,0.0009316808,0.0008190348,0.001493906,0.01805762,0.01833269,0.006288826,0.01421039,0.002277868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006453806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01336794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03563503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03362705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9709151,0.01051007,0.002994166,0.002584838,0.008336763,0.004658996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9441801,0.03379467,0.009809705,0.003056511,0.00701925,0.002139633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001721099,0.00007475032,0.008291177,0.0003278087,0.00005081318,0.0005098975,0.03142073,0.000345316,0.0002871119,0.8680524,0.04443603,0.04603197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000158842,0.0001545965,0.02179546,0.00134314,0.00005205139,0.000456542,0.01518879,0.0007036246,0.0003764886,0.7858216,0.1737408,0.0002081458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09353515,0.0183385,0.01456037,0.5595998,0.002221264,0.0001976613,0.0003410996,0.0001035322,0.3111026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8604625,0.004947916,0.001943876,0.1171161,0.00171167,0.0001633307,0.0001388638,0.00004566043,0.0134701],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03563503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1695548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02540723977455832,"score_gpt":0.2452614307588536,"score_spread":0.2198541909842953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}