{"id":"W3163855067","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0251488","title":"Getting to the bottom of research funding: Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Novo Nordisk Fonden; Novo Nordisk","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Top-down and bottom-up design; Political science; Computer science; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08347752,0.001258082,0.002612564,0.01165774,0.01586116,0.04713008,0.004233549,0.006129932,0.005776392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2684659,0.002045487,0.002036767,0.01392166,0.02152613,0.05894845,0.02416278,0.01097836,0.001430557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02354937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02020724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0240357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01460309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8927382,0.05437709,0.007473375,0.01429252,0.02142059,0.00969829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7654219,0.1524666,0.02698443,0.0231762,0.02487018,0.007080574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003075897,0.00007946112,0.04575401,0.0009487893,0.0002293596,0.0006794603,0.05723536,0.01003819,0.001370472,0.6832962,0.009470383,0.1905906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005722963,0.00009697653,0.02144159,0.001298181,0.0001243689,0.000326745,0.02057054,0.01176189,0.001269378,0.8691711,0.07372053,0.0001614295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2421532,0.01018532,0.4700252,0.1384055,0.0009406563,0.001056607,0.001185647,0.0009405712,0.1351074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8727558,0.002644152,0.1128431,0.003612228,0.0003669952,0.001057301,0.0003381731,0.0004910298,0.005891143],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4414766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8861340694074553,"score_gpt":0.5914378414414244,"score_spread":0.2946962279660309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}