{"id":"W3164863429","doi":"10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103026","title":"Crack growth modeling and simulation of a peridynamic fatigue model based on numerical and analytical solution approaches","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics","topic":"Numerical methods in engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Peridynamics; Paris' law; Materials science; Structural engineering; Deformation (meteorology); Mechanics; Numerical analysis; Crack closure; Computer simulation; Range (aeronautics); Fracture mechanics; Composite material; Mathematics; Continuum mechanics; Mathematical analysis; Engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002025701,0.0002172998,0.0003348397,0.00004504728,0.00004760685,0.00002612378,0.00004877043,0.00019175,0.00001108397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001262502,0.0001918313,0.0000354962,0.0001390897,0.0000794978,0.00003826939,0.00004836988,0.0003450755,2.850706e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002265868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009108849,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":3.119862e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.904857e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990436,0.00003312282,0.000233487,0.0002905015,0.0001808655,0.0002184182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993566,0.0003078646,0.00002167803,0.0001484113,0.00002882883,0.0001366158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002799544,0.00001951942,0.000001045187,0.00009624415,0.00001113618,7.717654e-7,0.00005445518,0.6761282,0.001294209,0.3187046,3.323088e-7,0.003661454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002305157,0.00002820908,0.000004051835,0.00002713767,0.00004792685,0.000002581235,0.00003115184,0.8550114,0.001854399,0.1425832,0.000001588287,0.0001778868],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03356947,0.00009935241,0.9655222,0.0001343281,0.0000244159,0.0001106448,0.000006561457,0.00008953235,0.0004435095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9009832,0.00002715975,0.0988192,0.00009077127,0.00002725255,0.000008986464,0.000008014124,0.00003484685,6.305165e-7],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8674136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7822654,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02163623967196954,"score_gpt":0.2434235265303622,"score_spread":0.2217872868583927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}