{"id":"W3164863429","doi":"10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103026","title":"Crack growth modeling and simulation of a peridynamic fatigue model based on numerical and analytical solution approaches","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics","topic":"Numerical methods in engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Peridynamics; Paris' law; Materials science; Structural engineering; Deformation (meteorology); Mechanics; Numerical analysis; Crack closure; Computer simulation; Range (aeronautics); Fracture mechanics; Composite material; Mathematics; Continuum mechanics; Mathematical analysis; Engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002002029,0.0003592591,0.00046593,0.0004742457,0.000414205,0.0004275925,0.000958044,0.001262957,0.001305659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006315028,0.0003067226,0.0004995036,0.0003246385,0.0003922465,0.000585555,0.0003365767,0.0004571553,0.000179281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004616527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007292253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01029037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006466056,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999009,0.00001595923,0.000006066055,0.00001920251,0.00003897984,0.00001882309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997557,0.00008780221,0.00002885425,0.00002515072,0.00008712042,0.00001542033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002079107,0.00004034581,0.0004746901,0.0000250976,0.000006964276,0.0000461315,0.00004571461,0.984457,0.007315834,0.003591091,0.0001607573,0.003815586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001485245,0.000006151286,0.00009505957,7.99689e-7,0.000001267116,0.00000485705,0.000002853859,0.9993008,0.0003631366,0.0001331425,0.0000886362,0.000001804629],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5827447,0.0005140631,0.389389,0.0004454853,0.0001224547,0.0001317435,0.0004424161,0.0006037483,0.02560641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720941,0.0001618522,0.02395881,0.00002563644,0.00001350924,0.0000901399,0.0001093496,0.00004486148,0.003501737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01029037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02046096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02163623967196954,"score_gpt":0.2434235265303622,"score_spread":0.2217872868583927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}