{"id":"W3167020393","doi":"","title":"A Jurisprudential “House of Cards”: The Power to Exclude Improperly Obtained Evidence in Civil Proceedings","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Nothing; Jurisprudence; Political science; Power (physics); Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Epistemology; Public law; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06236711,0.0003840099,0.001292938,0.003917234,0.01645586,0.02356669,0.004931256,0.02067056,0.00219675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1245972,0.001267545,0.0008179644,0.002586476,0.0782378,0.01092708,0.007120067,0.02102241,0.0007244977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01731866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05838842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1092034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1997639,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9051734,0.045315,0.005524402,0.008160311,0.03001641,0.00581041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8711976,0.09375836,0.00452302,0.00675377,0.02006568,0.003701521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001015763,0.00001255955,0.0004275343,0.000157407,0.0000156248,0.0002699225,0.004370823,0.00009218812,0.0002162661,0.9559466,0.02166315,0.01681775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008363015,0.00007960138,0.002965591,0.001963008,0.00008322978,0.0005284969,0.004850559,0.0005002782,0.0007129936,0.4858055,0.5022825,0.0001447013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01892736,0.07268125,0.01900173,0.5811934,0.004131068,0.0002238802,0.000118948,0.00009229255,0.3036302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7561198,0.02868431,0.01679359,0.1612602,0.005286241,0.0002532342,0.00006488396,0.0001158303,0.03142194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8907966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3298327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06187870100977665,"score_gpt":0.3434289064114926,"score_spread":0.2815502054017159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}