{"id":"W3167020393","doi":"","title":"A Jurisprudential “House of Cards”: The Power to Exclude Improperly Obtained Evidence in Civil Proceedings","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Nothing; Jurisprudence; Political science; Power (physics); Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Epistemology; Public law; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002869565,0.0001125199,0.0002783911,0.00004212858,0.0004892144,0.0001169475,0.0008203053,0.00004898326,0.0005093798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00225128,0.00006988992,0.0001131944,0.0008558301,0.0002157168,0.0001890345,0.00007934854,0.0001886838,0.0001312283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003150795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002100015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3716763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9385971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982942,0.0002275645,0.0003052183,0.0002343085,0.0004647445,0.0004740124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988272,0.0001342543,0.00007739421,0.0003181774,0.0003349404,0.0003079902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009008373,0.0001130552,0.007840122,0.006666153,0.0001265797,0.0004257462,0.1693061,0.000009827644,0.002191745,0.3593804,0.3885527,0.06529754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005057825,0.00003791264,0.004488398,0.006175281,0.00008233148,0.00001135234,0.00234909,0.000001044544,0.00005802441,0.0001855112,0.9863953,0.0001651679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1580215,0.2463897,0.000003094666,0.5584698,0.0005545063,0.002881637,0.00002160693,0.00005907034,0.03359906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666471,0.02623446,0.00002234105,0.006155463,0.0001015263,0.00006004642,2.737497e-7,0.00001447181,0.0007643096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8086256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6325077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06187870100977665,"score_gpt":0.3434289064114926,"score_spread":0.2815502054017159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}