{"id":"W3168878849","doi":"10.1017/9781108761970.002","title":"Reciprocity and IHL Compliance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); International humanitarian law; Reciprocal; Compliance (psychology); Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Section (typography); Law and economics; International law; Law; State (computer science); Sociology; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Social psychology; Social science; Philosophy; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006699686,0.0002704083,0.0003511841,0.0008884633,0.0023007,0.004237122,0.0009338862,0.002372191,0.008813241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008806646,0.0002355662,0.0004535481,0.0008983085,0.01397966,0.0051765,0.004863047,0.003704975,0.001232676],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002899501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002992152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001222079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001214044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993276,0.00350099,0.0002974834,0.0007775729,0.00151294,0.000635159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967861,0.001759984,0.0003901953,0.0005291195,0.0004022341,0.0001323861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000210057,0.000005419465,0.0001299792,0.00001752895,0.000001207194,0.00001812445,0.001039509,0.0001181821,0.00003071047,0.9938967,0.0008544093,0.003886133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001034803,0.00002645574,0.0006551103,0.0001619078,0.000006077652,0.00020769,0.001778986,0.0006200848,0.0002372032,0.8477763,0.1485055,0.00001442869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02563696,0.003027732,0.03359016,0.02000468,0.0003514896,0.0001236251,0.00006323859,0.00007763947,0.9171246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9163628,0.003504143,0.007725199,0.003452658,0.0003735185,0.0003315725,0.00008388351,0.00005769998,0.06810855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008813241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03543174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04068636037255408,"score_gpt":0.2437485782046641,"score_spread":0.2030622178321101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}