{"id":"W3170640792","doi":"10.18806/tesl.v37i1.1333","title":"Does the Quality of Source Notes Matter? An Exploratory Study of Source-based Academic Writing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TESL Canada Journal","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Copying; Redaction; Quality (philosophy); Popularity; Exploratory research; Humanities; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Linguistics; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Literature; Art; Philosophy; Political science; Social psychology; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01662591,0.000316029,0.0005519113,0.001702569,0.001120167,0.005628963,0.0009691747,0.0007353734,0.002166649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1332441,0.00035832,0.0003148396,0.002306601,0.002112136,0.003034983,0.002210991,0.001243569,0.0004590376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009546016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00105846,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001307252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00237826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9870935,0.007523194,0.001156235,0.0008943459,0.002830644,0.0005019935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7605935,0.1738427,0.04601223,0.005555773,0.01019036,0.00380545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003401431,0.0009542578,0.8067505,0.0001962011,0.000109513,0.0005509382,0.153263,0.0001261668,0.001763303,0.0005772426,0.0002567841,0.03511197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002473972,0.0008977564,0.9062646,0.0001288612,0.00004233624,0.0004488082,0.08817199,0.0005285909,0.001194224,0.0005825384,0.001680672,0.00003475622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990438,0.00005356125,0.0001587502,0.00006285464,0.000002210937,0.00001460591,0.00002224983,0.000002151789,0.0006397725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991367,0.00006826234,0.0002314157,0.00002773222,0.000004079115,0.00002642603,0.00003754592,0.000006043369,0.0004617613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9833741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08792728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08123880349729176,"score_gpt":0.3681992346723723,"score_spread":0.2869604311750805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}