{"id":"W3170918780","doi":"10.52981/fjes.v7i1.93","title":"Application of the Fuzzy AHP in Selection of Most Appropriate Construction Method for Tuti - Bahri Bridge","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FES Journal of Engineering Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Transportation of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Bridge (graph theory); Schedule; Christian ministry; Selection (genetic algorithm); Process (computing); Computer science; Truss; Fuzzy logic; Engineering; Construction engineering; Civil engineering; Operations research; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004305823,0.0007014979,0.0007947655,0.002810364,0.001298626,0.00178779,0.0007751132,0.0005425887,0.002021717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004737446,0.0003650237,0.00093119,0.002297788,0.0004125696,0.0006132869,0.001000198,0.0005476836,0.0001201601],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001495219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003569376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0101825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0105748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972588,0.001402392,0.0002107925,0.0001888671,0.0007294816,0.000209728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984587,0.0008104226,0.000124106,0.00003976027,0.0004916824,0.00007523532],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067263,0.0005477451,0.009890427,0.002395857,0.0004431972,0.001898177,0.003852905,0.4832404,0.01841391,0.02780189,0.004541302,0.4463017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001399074,0.0003601093,0.003804997,0.0002518024,0.0001630208,0.0001876215,0.002600206,0.9700314,0.006162922,0.01081364,0.005407411,0.00007684094],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1941455,0.0008766244,0.7845118,0.0007645861,0.0001101907,0.001939177,0.0003106327,0.0002169362,0.01712457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5809809,0.0004518954,0.4164959,0.00007372798,0.00001994795,0.0006338615,0.0002070323,0.00001941915,0.001117308],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0101825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02277166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07051968920281587,"score_gpt":0.3949890325800287,"score_spread":0.3244693433772128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}