{"id":"W3171148534","doi":"10.1108/jwl-10-2020-0163","title":"Exploring the usability of the andragogical process model for learning for designing, delivering and evaluating a workplace communication partner training","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Workplace Learning","topic":"Disability Education and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Université de Montréal; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation","keywords":"Usability; Andragogy; Knowledge management; Trainer; Process (computing); Originality; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Engineering; Pedagogy; Adult education; Psychology; Human–computer interaction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0626397,0.0011814,0.0008918164,0.00306424,0.001635329,0.008106994,0.001903604,0.001811144,0.002702181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1128094,0.000683082,0.001521657,0.001439782,0.003502044,0.005792319,0.005955254,0.002303858,0.0005729519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005733798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009435304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002878757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003761324,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9043996,0.0763552,0.003801913,0.001788079,0.01257747,0.001077751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8779717,0.09225734,0.003775651,0.01240187,0.01252943,0.001063884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00116048,0.002503374,0.03624298,0.006431438,0.0002851777,0.00105117,0.1088763,0.01773943,0.01527754,0.05051501,0.004280598,0.7556365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002087951,0.02086427,0.05682445,0.0293544,0.00130125,0.006792974,0.2649502,0.1496945,0.05179495,0.09695911,0.3177369,0.001638989],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3496777,0.001682565,0.5791036,0.004614027,0.0003585567,0.01000903,0.0002878947,0.001315442,0.05295116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6172631,0.0008095555,0.3748185,0.0005124168,0.00003565939,0.003617833,0.0001615919,0.0001702466,0.002611131],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0626397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3312743,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.321319082323148,"score_gpt":0.4307656442268447,"score_spread":0.1094465619036967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}