{"id":"W3171470307","doi":"10.3390/geohazards2020008","title":"A Quantitative Approach to Assess Seismic Vulnerability of Touristic Accommodations: Case Study in Montreal, Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GeoHazards","topic":"Seismic Performance and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Downtown; Tourism; Vulnerability index; Index (typography); Vulnerability assessment; Typology; Geography; Accommodation; City centre; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental resource management; Civil engineering; Engineering; Environmental science; Computer science; Psychology; Psychological intervention","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008562901,0.0009305124,0.0003228869,0.003614151,0.002051957,0.001295659,0.001234439,0.0005627912,0.001657557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00192736,0.0002309599,0.0005431077,0.004819042,0.001052406,0.0003560261,0.0008068567,0.0003661814,0.0001164038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02754932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009684804,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9774089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993056,0.0001686728,0.00002450172,0.00008135995,0.0001973939,0.0002223915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989792,0.0002661917,0.0001008542,0.00003535086,0.0004565499,0.0001618299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000580909,0.001111543,0.667437,0.0009791736,0.0004473352,0.01514045,0.01362404,0.1629099,0.01330903,0.01077054,0.007425802,0.1062644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006599444,0.0004740633,0.7230785,0.0002137955,0.0002362239,0.0009380467,0.05287263,0.2066863,0.003637528,0.001107092,0.01047905,0.0002106918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844173,0.0003670713,0.003880225,0.0001960978,0.000007585271,0.0004722049,0.001460962,0.00004829386,0.009150213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918342,0.0002868303,0.004580087,0.00002654881,0.000004112723,0.00006948168,0.0004987552,0.0000090929,0.00269097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02754932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1998852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03791057168903451,"score_gpt":0.2890631300630174,"score_spread":0.2511525583739829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}