{"id":"W3171874114","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2021-0026","title":"Comparative analyses with conventional surveys reveal the potential for an angler app to contribute to recreational fisheries monitoring","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Positive Living North","funders":"Alberta Environment and Parks; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Fishing; Recreational fishing; Recreation; Fishery; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Relative species abundance; Fisheries management; Data collection; TRIPS architecture; Environmental science; Ecology; Computer science; Biology; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01859477,0.0005698666,0.0004525052,0.002231898,0.000761135,0.002323725,0.0005874315,0.0005625289,0.002872502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07626076,0.000291312,0.000739573,0.001907226,0.0007476022,0.002987875,0.001807791,0.0006231623,0.0007855435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005745583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007606808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005156056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01475995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.980025,0.01181763,0.001415269,0.002384551,0.003594269,0.0007633948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8732945,0.09128097,0.01071704,0.007533801,0.01614346,0.001030251],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004564294,0.0001695962,0.9208869,0.0004089455,0.0003819737,0.000153132,0.006509571,0.0002204731,0.002099093,0.0004744665,0.0008948979,0.06734463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001489417,0.0009207407,0.98331,0.0001536181,0.0002592406,0.000274161,0.007202479,0.001572318,0.0014477,0.000356185,0.004458285,0.00003038553],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.97862,0.0003582539,0.007650665,0.000163097,0.00005771991,0.0003293227,0.0008529908,0.00009109221,0.01187692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908286,0.0001395846,0.00681017,0.0001328676,0.00002398246,0.000344295,0.0003774328,0.00003429362,0.001308735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01859477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09833974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06075886357876375,"score_gpt":0.2946788148383855,"score_spread":0.2339199512596218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}