{"id":"W3172789769","doi":"10.1016/j.rse.2021.112510","title":"Comparing airborne and spaceborne photon-counting LiDAR canopy structural estimates across different boreal forest types","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Remote Sensing of Environment","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Lidar; Canopy; Remote sensing; Environmental science; Taiga; Satellite; Altimeter; Tree canopy; Elevation (ballistics); Geography; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001497522,0.0002692985,0.0003826894,0.00002202979,0.0002844101,0.00006511498,0.00009895721,0.00008709089,0.00004608395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004065567,0.000252797,0.00007665218,0.0001089439,0.0004127021,0.00007305082,0.0003482964,0.0001873284,0.00003077634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001939252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001265243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002604948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009209957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982836,0.00004801861,0.000343815,0.00053374,0.0003536202,0.0004372505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990825,0.00009504207,0.0001823199,0.0004827513,0.000009765051,0.0001476108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008805982,0.0001387242,0.2081347,0.0001471317,0.0001980682,0.0001258828,0.00353716,0.01651661,0.4035465,0.0001217893,0.0002428392,0.3672025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004360268,0.00003843932,0.7511407,0.00009805438,0.00006067448,0.0001288406,0.0002747663,0.1685169,0.07695235,0.0009097935,0.00110493,0.0003385025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927794,0.000164281,0.003043839,0.0002465442,0.00007631698,0.0001669983,0.000007249623,0.00004197758,0.003473418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9595735,0.00009082775,0.04003455,0.00004710449,0.00004564704,8.351513e-8,0.00003487475,0.00003384566,0.0001395609],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5430059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01246657808293295,"score_gpt":0.2392509895405321,"score_spread":0.2267844114575992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}