{"id":"W3172845662","doi":"10.1186/s12916-021-02008-2","title":"Utilization of the evidence from studies with no events in meta-analyses of adverse events: an empirical investigation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medicine","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Medical Research Council; National Health and Medical Research Council; Qatar National Library","keywords":"Systematic review; Medicine; Meta-analysis; Adverse effect; MEDLINE; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4224945,0.005005739,0.01589722,0.01720225,0.001703044,0.0104756,0.006269424,0.005847166,0.005429806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.779615,0.004657128,0.06649881,0.02302469,0.005468733,0.01686984,0.007687928,0.006555471,0.0006634507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005237917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005687058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003439259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005034295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3318441,0.5223263,0.09971047,0.02029677,0.02374108,0.002081294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.07766046,0.8433947,0.04691424,0.02250137,0.008867833,0.0006613251],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004190629,0.0001346386,0.07660557,0.2017546,0.6564378,0.0006975369,0.001585811,0.002344954,0.0002478093,0.003627419,0.001289471,0.0510839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002135227,0.001709849,0.03029178,0.1209705,0.8061093,0.001737368,0.001257202,0.004849798,0.0007644767,0.02002426,0.009873238,0.000276994],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02003875,0.9148308,0.05484042,0.003120359,0.0009618667,0.002594273,0.001361981,0.0001767949,0.002074842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.745801,0.176158,0.06467161,0.003857908,0.001208951,0.006139543,0.001425947,0.0002525311,0.0004845585],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5775055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7121671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.951712016036363,"score_gpt":0.6398872374389903,"score_spread":0.3118247785973727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}