{"id":"W3173341267","doi":"10.22034/jna.2022.680837","title":"Synthesis and Characterization of forsterite nanopowder ceramic via mechanical activation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nanoanalysis","topic":"Advanced ceramic materials synthesis","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Forsterite; Materials science; Crystallite; Ball mill; Scanning electron microscope; Talc; Powder diffraction; Mechanosynthesis; Annealing (glass); Ceramic; Microstructure; Chemical engineering; Mineralogy; Metallurgy; Composite material; Crystallography; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000474973,0.0001547101,0.0006474475,0.0001693207,0.00005897642,0.00005042876,0.0002188882,0.00008610251,0.0006759388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004394975,0.0001276045,0.000156574,0.0002981774,0.00005676641,0.0005861757,0.00006532807,0.00007295621,0.000008663915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004744007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003392991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005816757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.996889e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981562,0.0001912971,0.0008852347,0.0002022744,0.0004033512,0.0001616325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980053,0.0001843359,0.001299468,0.0001549719,0.0002307375,0.0001251489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001935077,0.00003372004,0.0001151886,0.00006307992,0.00007708282,0.000003894229,0.0001720012,0.00004356305,0.9943127,0.00003789301,0.000004099576,0.004943263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001978983,0.00009656131,0.001071606,0.00006583165,0.0002908667,0.00002174992,0.00006106365,0.001221021,0.9964789,0.0002360298,0.0001390808,0.0001194395],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9370657,0.00002048787,0.06150115,0.001195929,0.0001013178,0.00006940265,0.00001887218,0.00001264334,0.0000145616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953035,0.00008652847,0.004258226,0.0001704027,0.0001446003,0.000002974696,0.000002498515,0.00001986161,0.00001144626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05823782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7401056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01371568071978207,"score_gpt":0.2314368285692507,"score_spread":0.2177211478494686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}