{"id":"W3173383043","doi":"10.3390/nano11071644","title":"Optimization of the Electrospun Niobium–Tungsten Oxide Nanofibers Diameter Using Response Surface Methodology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nanomaterials","topic":"Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Nanofiber; Response surface methodology; Materials science; Electrospinning; Central composite design; Composite material; Tungsten; Composite number; Polymer; Volumetric flow rate; Mathematics; Statistics; Thermodynamics; Metallurgy; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002620678,0.0002454369,0.000562607,0.00006338531,0.0002415652,0.00008535162,0.0006143036,0.0002658482,0.0009563472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004816723,0.0001871249,0.0001541719,0.0007797534,0.0004074047,0.0001570264,0.0003062095,0.00007615978,0.00003233309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000188487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004951413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004878077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003892356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952565,0.00239285,0.0008170708,0.0005621595,0.0004293925,0.0005419884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972367,0.000933524,0.00051979,0.0009162745,0.0002954452,0.00009828245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002116582,0.00005743558,0.0001524922,0.00002806709,0.00002097107,0.000003636052,0.0001060148,0.0009139665,0.9978107,0.0004551893,0.000214175,0.00002564996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003544255,0.00005072149,0.0004362574,0.00003663437,0.00006732209,0.00009015338,0.0000254958,0.0001681183,0.9971991,0.0007435376,0.0006251743,0.000203021],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.9358236,0.0002111121,0.06168881,0.0006902027,0.0009587481,0.0003846687,0.00008281678,0.00008824455,0.00007181407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2561024,0.00003283695,0.7426491,0.0004185063,0.00008277369,0.00003334654,0.00001909974,0.00005122994,0.0006106984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6809604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999569,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03634016132494087,"score_gpt":0.2976959605101275,"score_spread":0.2613557991851866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}