{"id":"W3173463654","doi":"10.1096/fasebj.2018.32.1_supplement.894.15","title":"Dropping the base: Characterizing the hypercarbia recovery strategies following extreme hypercapnia in the highly CO <sub>2</sub> tolerant hagfish ( <i>Eptatretus stoutii</i> )","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The FASEB Journal","topic":"Physiological and biochemical adaptations","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hagfish; Hypercarbia; Hypercapnia; Chemistry; Acidosis; Animal science; Biology; Endocrinology; Biochemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009803384,0.0001909925,0.000270234,0.0001442032,0.0001702226,0.000386519,0.0002002289,0.0003713674,0.0005431162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001902837,0.0001618816,0.0002162457,0.00009347534,0.0003623045,0.000288498,0.0003834268,0.0004135837,0.0001228627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002787928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003033711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002514137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004607905,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999528,0.000002659036,0.00000393698,0.00001369254,0.00001046431,0.00001642718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998783,0.000008339579,0.00004739021,0.00001015165,0.00001683692,0.00003895786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005068922,0.0000380211,0.01432674,0.00004685246,0.00001007065,0.0001367728,0.0001755707,0.0001098074,0.9828593,0.00002056867,0.00002495549,0.001744423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003051405,0.002821897,0.7569773,0.00001917596,0.00006046001,0.0005434136,0.001786264,0.001143658,0.235246,0.0001092482,0.001233667,0.00002831516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995555,0.00005484204,0.0001184989,0.00001477923,0.000002069288,0.00001090698,0.00004971808,0.000002984346,0.0001906953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997964,0.0001422588,0.0004260605,0.00006928665,0.000002777875,0.00003986698,0.0002035611,0.000003442773,0.001148842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002514137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004998982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02843990024807447,"score_gpt":0.2233571563407815,"score_spread":0.1949172560927071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}