{"id":"W3173481014","doi":"","title":"Chang's Parity: An Alternative Way to Challenge Balancing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Intuition; Parity (physics); Premise; Human rights; Maximization; Epistemology; Positive economics; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Political science; Microeconomics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02086838,0.001142809,0.001453591,0.003399802,0.003208189,0.006208173,0.003722117,0.00616403,0.00965107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0551082,0.000605434,0.001926592,0.00289867,0.01854813,0.01631144,0.008806841,0.009928096,0.0009167905],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004989238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004190153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009558175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006834174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9801588,0.01058981,0.0006897419,0.002796099,0.004715031,0.001050488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804839,0.01203316,0.00151262,0.003376043,0.002003464,0.0005907246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001219124,0.000006464335,0.00008166298,0.00001010849,0.000005610342,0.00001988984,0.0001786858,0.0002126716,0.0000866211,0.9959292,0.0006459383,0.002810932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002123722,0.00003468171,0.00006749341,0.00001874453,0.000007381488,0.00004290968,0.00009080974,0.001535386,0.0002211247,0.9927127,0.005236615,0.00001097509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0575235,0.0009036821,0.5330009,0.05738201,0.00145947,0.0003415948,0.0002163406,0.0003788083,0.3487936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9141912,0.0002786816,0.06153169,0.009862671,0.000679672,0.0006478954,0.00006345474,0.0001353735,0.0126094],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02086838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1103638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03588919667236481,"score_gpt":0.3296883667264729,"score_spread":0.2937991700541082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}