{"id":"W3173816976","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2020-0657","title":"Evaluation of flow liquefaction and liquefied strength using the cone penetration test: an update","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geotechnical engineering; Liquefaction; Cone penetration test; Penetration test; Soil water; Geology; Drainage; Soil liquefaction; Clay soil; Penetration (warfare); Shear strength (soil); Engineering; Soil science; Subgrade","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009219774,0.002858398,0.002678185,0.01380411,0.0009614062,0.003810816,0.005479612,0.002862961,0.003243488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02092897,0.001752092,0.001741602,0.006189155,0.002873714,0.004066092,0.001890113,0.002850096,0.004882265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00322041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004272738,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04228732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9826657,0.002090646,0.002053736,0.001309207,0.01160265,0.0002780733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9606382,0.006195234,0.002677393,0.001911198,0.02804471,0.0005331528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002251901,0.0003716243,0.03615548,0.002633825,0.0002212851,0.001039467,0.0007502093,0.0024415,0.01825183,0.003388087,0.04900494,0.8855165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005252483,0.0008188505,0.09867789,0.00361523,0.0007188851,0.01693715,0.001612685,0.01931641,0.07830375,0.005738817,0.7732899,0.0009180013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04840549,0.2141592,0.6350567,0.009284002,0.006900065,0.002019429,0.01032945,0.006625142,0.06722053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1329385,0.1921766,0.5956466,0.003473719,0.002149704,0.001583256,0.007547305,0.001832672,0.06265163],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04228732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08408237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02281065192488183,"score_gpt":0.2396854552657234,"score_spread":0.2168748033408416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}