{"id":"W3176691476","doi":"10.20886/jwas.v8i1.6175","title":"Analysis of Tenurial Conflict of the Bunaken National Park (A Case Study of Mantehage Island)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnal Wasian","topic":"Agricultural and Environmental Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Encana (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary (topology); National park; Settlement (finance); Geography; Human settlement; Decree; Land cover; Land use; Environmental protection; Nature Conservation; Forestry; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Archaeology; Ecology; Environmental science; Civil engineering; Business; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002317737,0.00004882607,0.0001654717,0.00004051231,0.0001280375,0.000008138601,0.0001331619,0.00002394278,0.0002211939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003265295,0.00002851645,0.0001387066,0.0005649463,0.0001025778,0.0000453572,0.00007026387,0.00004807099,9.02657e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003459879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002286025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002835639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01591686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989399,0.0001342985,0.0002348564,0.00009245275,0.0005221338,0.0000763657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996138,0.00003485845,0.0001815267,0.00008510161,0.00005648904,0.00002820957],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001036182,0.003815594,0.8322622,0.00006179816,0.005108912,0.0006852007,0.1327173,0.003278573,0.005087113,0.008741163,0.002144176,0.005994339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005874434,0.0001026481,0.834029,0.00001535174,0.0007366258,0.00001518253,0.1602974,0.00006795178,0.0004957379,0.0001111179,0.00344962,0.00009189608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867795,0.00002371737,0.000002926581,0.0003708973,0.00008239256,0.0001151001,0.00002839243,0.000001941294,0.01259515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987169,0.00001051377,0.00001251329,0.00002088805,0.00005547747,0.000002415682,0.000003454802,0.000001447168,0.001176385],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0275801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8881983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02913305172189532,"score_gpt":0.2945663006892559,"score_spread":0.2654332489673606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}