{"id":"W3179070767","doi":"10.24908/pceea.vi0.14841","title":"STUDENTS AS PARTNERS PEDAGOGICAL APPROACH IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION: A CASE STUDY AND MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVE REFLECTION","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Perspective (graphical); Conversation; Reflection (computer programming); Curriculum; Engineering education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Engineering management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01625493,0.001099499,0.0008840073,0.001763985,0.01414247,0.008917879,0.003529545,0.006302432,0.003221962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02324764,0.0008991593,0.0009410985,0.001691073,0.01005301,0.006419173,0.01197849,0.008533141,0.0008999115],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003810861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004964548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00243381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005112189,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9607311,0.03255861,0.0005678891,0.001360861,0.0024307,0.002350733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806657,0.01226099,0.001227229,0.001099619,0.001261957,0.003484384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006455387,0.001508926,0.003834144,0.0001550124,0.00001835964,0.00581065,0.9482394,0.0003292968,0.00134788,0.008215292,0.001696248,0.02878019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004254056,0.0007110282,0.001561152,0.0002381525,0.00002128872,0.003891375,0.9417826,0.001004585,0.002032624,0.002492687,0.04616352,0.00005858869],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9460937,0.0007268105,0.018991,0.009000523,0.0002252234,0.0007666468,0.00003564231,0.0001046713,0.02405574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808972,0.0007240804,0.007007094,0.001163205,0.0000414305,0.0003385883,0.00001858456,0.00005330207,0.009756686],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01625493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08596534,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05432544100605467,"score_gpt":0.4013537602599315,"score_spread":0.3470283192538768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}