{"id":"W3179070767","doi":"10.24908/pceea.vi0.14841","title":"STUDENTS AS PARTNERS PEDAGOGICAL APPROACH IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION: A CASE STUDY AND MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVE REFLECTION","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Perspective (graphical); Conversation; Reflection (computer programming); Curriculum; Engineering education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Engineering management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001019608,0.0001289668,0.0001507424,0.0002725051,0.0004094864,0.0002669434,0.0001726699,0.0001179888,0.00003893517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002617362,0.0001427415,0.00004640283,0.0009302861,0.00001819288,0.0003472824,0.00003625274,0.0003110325,0.000003069968],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00410568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002415044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1139478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06669143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998659,0.00005048625,0.0002575308,0.0002896426,0.0004627655,0.000280622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985983,0.00009909054,0.0001850875,0.00008954517,0.000778564,0.0002494107],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003589747,0.001091056,0.8104802,0.0001064187,0.0001074937,0.000003268654,0.164331,0.0004719059,0.0001150886,0.01956864,0.003145467,0.0005758104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004896909,0.00003556281,0.2911693,0.0001046154,0.00009201753,0.00006686007,0.6615881,0.000398062,0.00006300695,0.0001717501,0.04544175,0.0003793102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863955,0.0001664191,0.000004097344,0.003773796,0.001131603,0.0005807715,0.000002318916,0.00004004218,0.007905462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946774,0.00003192994,0.0004857925,0.0001391272,0.0002475585,0.0001409987,0.000003461831,0.00001829412,0.004255471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5193109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05432544100605467,"score_gpt":0.4013537602599315,"score_spread":0.3470283192538768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}