{"id":"W3182703823","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2020-0012","title":"An analysis of quality liability insurance for prefabricated components using evolutionary game theory","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Alberta","funders":"North China University of Technology","keywords":"Evolutionary game theory; Game theory; Stochastic game; Government (linguistics); Quality (philosophy); Risk analysis (engineering); Liability; Computer science; Corporate governance; Sample (material); Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001446769,0.0005909759,0.0006586052,0.0009514281,0.0006751148,0.001416012,0.0009988006,0.001167009,0.003017658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003709325,0.000353563,0.0009968,0.0005869707,0.001003084,0.001893617,0.0008536287,0.001112242,0.0001065095],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002494052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002569112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01446378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007232158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992261,0.0003089826,0.00002317665,0.00009041349,0.0001673695,0.0001838662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987466,0.0007783528,0.0001629654,0.00003069198,0.0001859424,0.00009529488],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000353746,0.00007500324,0.00391512,0.00007258216,0.00005489035,0.0004402946,0.0001917247,0.8044872,0.001514565,0.1786126,0.0006644495,0.009936146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007324237,0.00003442654,0.0008810644,0.00001027071,0.0000180658,0.00005291556,0.00009604313,0.9783251,0.0001592168,0.01992959,0.0004749898,0.00001103061],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3719658,0.0006365982,0.5924993,0.001148711,0.00005670551,0.0002242451,0.0001058665,0.00004638376,0.03331632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797463,0.0003272923,0.01556067,0.0000459621,0.00001175542,0.00007702798,0.00003188132,0.000009037873,0.004189897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01446378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02875918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08233965578885973,"score_gpt":0.3394676740160137,"score_spread":0.257128018227154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}