{"id":"W3183595074","doi":"10.1007/s10792-021-01966-z","title":"A comparative analysis of 12 intraocular lens power formulas","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Ophthalmology","topic":"Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; Kensington Health; Health Sciences Centre; Canada Research Chairs; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Mean squared prediction error; Ophthalmology; Intraocular lens; Intraocular lens power calculation; Refractive error; Mean absolute error; Mathematics; Phacoemulsification; Visual acuity; Algorithm; Keratometer; Statistics; Mean squared error","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003039452,0.0004830055,0.0009523456,0.003698373,0.0003742109,0.0007491198,0.0004861034,0.0004312634,0.004537055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01598569,0.0001541693,0.0009790238,0.002499171,0.0003941874,0.000976923,0.000501955,0.0003040432,0.0004696809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007471606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005415063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002157703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001849779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978567,0.0009279901,0.0003916054,0.0001585523,0.0005524529,0.0001127297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819703,0.01343504,0.001212389,0.0005905195,0.002497202,0.0002945375],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.07339922,0.001567405,0.5929835,0.001583312,0.002943098,0.001260223,0.001695364,0.0009268013,0.00681637,0.001121307,0.0009358098,0.3147676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002424785,0.03097636,0.9399226,0.0003096718,0.004953555,0.002248704,0.00452094,0.002392892,0.00636222,0.0008594122,0.004938558,0.000090218],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993633,0.004013035,0.0004314403,0.00002867421,0.00001701537,0.00004692873,0.000234907,0.00001000566,0.001584923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978487,0.001001238,0.0004901777,0.00001833007,0.00001252132,0.00002511036,0.0002177079,0.000009376946,0.0003769003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004537055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01607436,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06533863296559714,"score_gpt":0.4076984135696292,"score_spread":0.342359780604032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}