{"id":"W3183595074","doi":"10.1007/s10792-021-01966-z","title":"A comparative analysis of 12 intraocular lens power formulas","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Ophthalmology","topic":"Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; Kensington Health; Health Sciences Centre; Canada Research Chairs; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Mean squared prediction error; Ophthalmology; Intraocular lens; Intraocular lens power calculation; Refractive error; Mean absolute error; Mathematics; Phacoemulsification; Visual acuity; Algorithm; Keratometer; Statistics; Mean squared error","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001189988,0.0001358143,0.0006531918,0.0003434262,0.00004088054,0.000004850754,0.0001043922,0.0001165078,0.004114265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000147036,0.000122721,0.0003041943,0.0003759065,0.000186359,0.00007914477,0.0001127501,0.0001498164,0.00004251904],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005440322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007469023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002527424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003948537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988959,0.0000722645,0.000360222,0.0002694506,0.000219386,0.0001827919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989815,0.0001780582,0.0001337383,0.0002022304,0.0004528441,0.00005161659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005010702,0.001605897,0.9604851,0.00002047349,0.01564798,0.002013365,0.0008495073,0.0001076282,0.009666327,0.008461195,0.0006184982,0.00002296675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009842489,0.001053338,0.98273,0.00002573513,0.001207462,0.003513952,0.0003792658,0.0004230218,0.007509541,0.0004036196,0.001646922,0.0001229007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9350077,0.0002256917,0.000093414,0.00125547,0.0004205059,0.00009380584,0.00003697502,0.00001346965,0.06285297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963816,0.00001669148,0.0005375759,0.0002861634,0.00004444965,0.00001373328,0.0001611367,0.000006013565,0.002552642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0613739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06533863296559714,"score_gpt":0.4076984135696292,"score_spread":0.342359780604032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}