{"id":"W3184353072","doi":"10.11575/prism/38876","title":"Quantitative Mechanical Properties of Carbon-based Surfaces Examined through Analysis of Cantilever Dynamics in Atomic Force Microscopy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Calgary","keywords":"Cantilever; Atomic force microscopy; Dynamics (music); Nanotechnology; Materials science; Carbon fibers; Microscopy; Composite material; Chemical physics; Chemistry; Physics; Optics; Acoustics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003433334,0.0003545658,0.0002546179,0.0007110691,0.0003078572,0.0004244854,0.0003780498,0.0005774543,0.0009494415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006102397,0.0001891016,0.0001511677,0.0006297175,0.0002302256,0.0003907077,0.00022964,0.0004594281,0.0002350121],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003223443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001411956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001227682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002860591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997292,0.00001632579,0.000009650828,0.00004770002,0.0001740812,0.00002297069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999724,0.0001174122,0.00003917824,0.00002112075,0.00008552249,0.00001270119],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001294016,0.00001443387,0.0006468268,0.00006511356,0.00000534235,0.00004471866,0.00007284428,0.000429412,0.9931722,0.0001309662,0.00005591358,0.005349297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007757096,0.0002093698,0.04220657,0.00004456942,0.0000264651,0.000267563,0.0002661784,0.03659361,0.9168316,0.0003946847,0.003104986,0.00004673954],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.9383419,0.001790391,0.05570348,0.0001457109,0.00005698445,0.0001010242,0.0007056488,0.0002572536,0.00289785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9366705,0.001982055,0.05854441,0.00006954353,0.00001642603,0.000146177,0.0005085098,0.00004514563,0.002017349],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001227682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003176212,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01153371522903142,"score_gpt":0.2477629814409903,"score_spread":0.2362292662119588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}