{"id":"W3185287204","doi":"10.1002/int.22562","title":"A new method for deriving priority from dual hesitant fuzzy preference relations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Dual (grammatical number); Preference relation; Computer science; Group decision-making; Fuzzy logic; Probabilistic logic; Property (philosophy); Basis (linear algebra); Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004445973,0.0002115022,0.0005907013,0.0005427096,0.0001162873,0.001261913,0.001438778,0.0001380626,0.000968907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01538671,0.0001644571,0.0004633591,0.000381867,0.0000233894,0.0007021474,0.0002644217,0.0003166207,0.0001790981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003387275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007636303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002067633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009593282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927076,0.0006012734,0.002705362,0.0004831985,0.003264018,0.0002385452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843639,0.007528713,0.001783144,0.0004718125,0.005578425,0.0002739902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001839937,0.0007961037,0.0312599,0.00003232156,0.002705542,0.001571333,0.01115393,0.03184048,0.130452,0.06331425,0.1204465,0.6045877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003723492,0.0004516122,0.02636213,0.002652612,0.0002692378,0.003852376,0.01266582,0.1416587,0.04908931,0.2481885,0.5098765,0.001209659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05025265,0.001277813,0.9355228,0.001358776,0.01055238,0.0002119031,0.000109671,0.00001599303,0.0006980211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7263649,0.00004132793,0.2687466,0.0001333478,0.001884305,0.000006980648,0.00001054486,0.00002211006,0.002789954],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6761122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2587212012644264,"score_gpt":0.4737449613594993,"score_spread":0.2150237600950729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}