{"id":"W3185759631","doi":"10.70930/tac/ndwo9npa","title":"A practical type theory for symmetric monoidal categories","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and applications of categories","topic":"Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Carnegie Mellon University","keywords":"Mathematics; Symmetric monoidal category; Morphism; Type (biology); Algebra over a field; Closed monoidal category; Pure mathematics; Tensor product; Monoidal category; Domain (mathematical analysis); Notation; Enriched category; Tensor (intrinsic definition); Arithmetic; Mathematical analysis; Functor","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005409285,0.0006619908,0.0006816822,0.001507184,0.002251131,0.003906174,0.002143039,0.001642551,0.006365069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003708466,0.0007573463,0.001804807,0.001378963,0.005659626,0.01061464,0.003353497,0.004468342,0.001732239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002318296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001673608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001274145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001108325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974689,0.0008616725,0.0002635215,0.0003807888,0.0008094818,0.000215562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977907,0.0006411822,0.00007722042,0.000724481,0.0006084989,0.0001579463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005021547,0.000007211441,0.0000720941,0.00002141821,0.000002691375,0.00003411479,0.0001359516,0.0004077101,0.0004140062,0.9941505,0.0007344074,0.004014865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001098966,0.00001995286,0.00007400723,0.00002504235,0.000009079006,0.0001363574,0.0001000511,0.005136108,0.001543319,0.9718425,0.02108616,0.00001653036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01183952,0.0004529624,0.9608874,0.001710833,0.0004380392,0.00009104337,0.0003199706,0.0004975991,0.02376256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4245149,0.0008260765,0.5476562,0.001297745,0.0007929536,0.000314987,0.0006434479,0.0003690031,0.02358474],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006365069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02860737,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03009412390226117,"score_gpt":0.3374491245823154,"score_spread":0.3073550006800542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}