{"id":"W3185765993","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-77277-2_8","title":"Persuasive Technology in Games: A Brief Review and Reappraisal","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasive technology; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Game design; Game mechanics; Management science; Human–computer interaction; Data science; Persuasion; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002399488,0.001262197,0.002738821,0.004712844,0.0004207442,0.002635514,0.001713918,0.002683896,0.003162947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004250298,0.0007053219,0.001147465,0.004472767,0.001064978,0.003428063,0.001158565,0.002845694,0.001442048],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001072637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002564775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001872244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003991726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992788,0.0001610156,0.0001748023,0.0001273056,0.0002071377,0.00005092283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963092,0.002807196,0.0002568257,0.00005140267,0.0004690273,0.000106416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001806464,0.0001863312,0.0002444608,0.08528309,0.0002756295,0.000173475,0.0002068721,0.0002727066,0.0008616615,0.004715114,0.01543061,0.8921694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001349577,0.0005217978,0.002586731,0.0553164,0.00130935,0.001968481,0.0004259937,0.0003269475,0.001030759,0.00439309,0.9318804,0.000105197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004679454,0.9994907,0.00006528779,0.000125613,0.00009463004,0.000004544421,0.000005385502,0.000002076118,0.0001648444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005408935,0.998696,0.0001977927,0.0002525174,0.0001649334,0.00001053262,0.00001136082,0.000001400296,0.0001245545],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004712844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01268989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02891795864523073,"score_gpt":0.3569334740617026,"score_spread":0.3280155154164718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}