{"id":"W3185765993","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-77277-2_8","title":"Persuasive Technology in Games: A Brief Review and Reappraisal","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasive technology; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Game design; Game mechanics; Management science; Human–computer interaction; Data science; Persuasion; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001225231,0.0006079006,0.00201352,0.002804068,0.0001496408,0.0002814237,0.003302091,0.0005924037,0.000009254321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001302043,0.0005325425,0.0001365886,0.01216768,0.001134917,0.0007334591,0.002444235,0.002023797,0.00001694251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003416553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00101817,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001802108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004583128,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954861,0.000248576,0.0009265233,0.002137523,0.000422749,0.0007785622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968397,0.0006291239,0.0005052834,0.001607496,0.0003539074,0.000064459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[2.526324e-7,0.00003895755,0.0000114481,0.002659723,0.00001212189,0.0001951447,0.0001527709,0.000008710696,0.000003048149,0.007373799,0.00002737831,0.9895166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006743241,0.0005625223,0.00004341339,0.1669167,0.0001862523,0.007949172,0.000005516578,0.01225225,0.0002287225,0.01481496,0.7936492,0.002716923],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003344182,0.5526699,0.4448969,0.001350541,0.0004732308,0.0004712652,0.000001280237,0.0001125753,0.00002088645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001957665,0.8904395,0.1076243,0.001513282,0.00006828964,0.0001313021,0.000004728892,0.00002111517,0.000001720915],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9867997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02891795864523073,"score_gpt":0.3569334740617026,"score_spread":0.3280155154164718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}