{"id":"W3186002470","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/ac14ee","title":"Uncertainty in optimal fingerprinting is underestimated","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Research Letters","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Statistics; Econometrics; Scaling; Confidence interval; Forcing (mathematics); Environmental science; Sample size determination; Calibration; Climate change; Climate model; Sample (material); Omitted-variable bias; Computer science; Climatology; Mathematics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001093825,0.0001505736,0.0001538393,0.00006842051,0.0002155119,0.00006828246,0.0002865666,0.00007817819,0.01317171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001377608,0.0001617522,0.00006554946,0.0003622251,0.0005491649,0.0002278324,0.0009331607,0.0005400716,0.001527098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001028515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001720857,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004845114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001152729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997169,0.0003080232,0.0002619658,0.0006553839,0.0008230222,0.000782614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990999,0.0002745145,0.00002941114,0.0004363538,0.000002089495,0.0001577529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004257451,0.0004578509,0.1786198,0.00001628285,0.00001331834,0.0003400011,0.001498936,0.1118216,0.7007816,0.0000356838,0.003004855,0.003367475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003058987,0.0001770913,0.6704302,0.000172262,0.0000192279,0.00009344074,0.00361152,0.1821694,0.1046122,0.002506595,0.03166512,0.001483941],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917373,0.00003565607,0.0002160653,0.005181709,0.00004080026,0.0001926044,0.00001584743,0.00002311489,0.002556887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963786,0.0000597045,0.001468667,0.001604866,0.00002027428,0.00003052249,0.00002938609,0.00002093258,0.0003870585],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5961695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992504,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05443228819593719,"score_gpt":0.3208279395218018,"score_spread":0.2663956513258646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}